Iraq was created by the victorious British after the defeat of the Ottoman Turks in World War I, from territory that had been taken from the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire had existed for hundreds of years and was ruled from Istanbul, Turkey.
The British created Iraq and drew up its boundaries based on their interests and not on the interests of the people of the area. They ignored ethnic groups and thought only of territory as they drew the boundaries of Iraq. A British woman, Gertrude Bell, is the person who actually drew the borders of Iraq on a map.
Thus the Kurds, Sunnis, and the Shiites were forced to share the same "country". These hostile groups could only be held together by strong force, first the British and then dictators. When the US removed the dictatorship of Sadam, how could we expect anything but civil war?
There are only two "solutions" for "peace" in Iraq -- another dictator or partition. The people deserve better than the oppression of a dictator, so that leaves partition.
The US should begin to call for and recruit an open international conference bringing all sides to the table -- the Sunnis, the Shiites, the Kurds, the Assyrian Christians, Jordan, Syria, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the Arab League, the United Nations, and all the splinter groups withing Iraq, even the so called terrorists. The objective should be to divide Iraq into at least three countries -- a Kurdish country, a Sunni country, and a Shiite country. Their boundaries should be negotiated as fairly as possible with boundaries drawn to share resources as much as possible on a per person basis so that each group (country) is treated fairly.
The boundaries should be secured by an international peace force consisting mainly of Moslem troops from various countries. The 3 (or more) new countries should agree to be demilitarized for a time period of 20 or more years (much like Japan). After the peace treaty is signed and the peace keepers are in place, the US should get out.
What do you think?